Q & A with Heyer’s Biographer

Note from Cheryl Bolen: Jennifer Kloester was kind enough to allow me to interview her and has also consented to be available here Oct. 8 to answer questions from readers. To see a comprehensive review of Kloester’s biography, read my June 18 blog.

Wow, Jennifer. I am so pleased you’ve agreed to come on my blog to discuss your research into Georgette Heyer and Regency England.

~ It’s my absolute pleasure. Thank you for inviting me to your terrific blog.

I see where your research is tied in with a doctoral dissertation. Can you speak to that a bit? Which came first? The Heyer biography? Or the post-graduate work? And from what institution did you earn your doctorate? Georgette Heyer

~ I earned my doctorate from the University of Melbourne, who were incredibly supportive of my work on Heyer. I had a scholarship for the duration of my degree as well as a couple of travel grants during the three years I was studying. The doctorate actually arose out of my fascination with Heyer’s Regency novels and what I saw as her seamless integration of history and fiction. There are so many instances in her books where, unless the reader knows the history, it’s impossible to tell whether a character or event is real or made up. I found that intriguing. I began researching Heyer in the late 1990s but it was the research for my doctorate (which I began in 2001) that prompted me to think about writing the biography. I’d discovered so much new and fascinating material about Heyer that I really felt compelled to share it.

I see that you live Down Under. Were you living in England at the time of your research, or did you plan dedicated research trips? How much actual time did you spend in England doing this research?  

~ I would love to spend a year living in England but so far that’s still a dream. Between 1999 and 2009 I made 9 trips to the UK to research the biography, discovering more and more information each time. The longest trip was six weeks and the shortest was ten days when I went over for Sir Richard’s memorial service. Every trip was jam-packed with research and interviews and meeting everyone I could find who had known her.

Gosh, I’m in awe. You actually interviewed Georgette Heyer’s son and former daughter-in-law. How were you able to accomplish this? 

~ I first wrote to Georgette’s son, Sir Richard Rougier in 2001. I sent a formal letter telling him about my doctorate and asking if I could interview him. He wrote me a charming reply and invited me for lunch at his home in Somerset. That first meeting was amazing: he was a little guarded at first but as the lunch progressed he began to tell me more and more about his parents. In fact, at the end of lunch he unexpectedly told me about his father’s suicide! After our first meeting he and his wife invited me to stay for a few days so I could thoroughly peruse Georgette’s notebooks and private papers. You can imagine how thrilled I was and that first stay would prove to be the first of many delightful visits to their home. Each time I went, Sir Richard would tell me more about his mother and produce more material to help me in my research. I’ll never forget the day he produced the family photo albums – including the one from Georgette’s time in Tanganyika – and Georgette’s baby book. On my second trip, Sir Richard introduced me to his first wife, Susie, Lady Rougier, and we have since become great friends. As you can imagine, her insights into Georgette were fascinating!

In my opinion, the most fascinating aspect of your biography was the correspondence between her and her publishing associates. How were you able to get your hands on letters that are 80 and more years old? 

~ Finding so many early letters was the most exciting part of the research. I already knew about the letters to Georgette’s publisher at Heinemann because they were such an important part of Jane Aiken Hodge’s biography but I was sure there must be other letters. I learned about the amazing collection of Heyer letters held by the University of Tulsa in December 2001, just after I had first contacted Sir Richard. I needed his permission to use them and so I wrote to him in great excitement and he very kindly authorized me to have them copied and sent out to Australia. Tulsa University were brilliant and when the box arrived with over 600 pages of her letters I actually cried. These letters dated from 1923 when she was only twenty and was writing These Old Shades. I also discovered another, small archive at the British Library, and in Australia I was contacted by a woman who, as a teenager, had corresponded with Georgette after the Second World War and had half a dozen delightful letters to share with me. The other fabulous collections were in private hands and I was lucky enough to be given permission by the owners to copy these. One collection had 93 personal letters to A.S. Frere, her friend and publisher at Heinemann, and the other was the Reinhardt collection and together they gave me tons of new material. It was the most exciting thing reading these letters for the first time (and many times after) because they provided so much new insight into Georgette Heyer as both a woman and a writer.

JK - 017  © Greg Noakes 2011

Jennifer Kloester

It is clear from your biography that you went back over Heyer’s works and reread them. Did you read all of them again? Was it hard finding copies of her suppressed books?

~I reread her books many times – although some more than others. There was so much new information in the letters that it sometimes changed my previous understanding of the book and how it had been written. It was also fascinating to discover her own attitude to her work and especially to read and find so much of Heyer herself in the text. The four suppressed contemporary novels are a great example of this because these are her most autobiographical novels. Helen, in particular, has several important parallels with Georgette’s own life, while Pastel seems to reflect some of her ideas about marriage and relationships. Most of those who have read Barren Corn dislike it, but I read it three times while writing the biography and found it remarkable in several ways, not least for its insight into human psychology. It took a little while to get hold of copies of the suppressed novels but in the early days of my research I was able to get them through inter-library loans. Later, with the rise of the internet and used-book sites, I was able to buy my own copies. Today, I actually own a copy of Instead of the Thorn that Georgette signed to her agent, L.P. Moore.

Please discuss Heyer’s research notebooks. (I first learned of these years ago in Hodge’s book and would almost give my firstborn to see them.) Where did you see these, and do you know where they are now?  

~ These are a fascinating collection held by the family. When I went back to stay with Sir Richard he very generously gave me the run of his study where the notebooks where kept on a shelf. As you can imagine, I found them utterly absorbing. They are very ‘Heyer’ in their type and style of information recorded and over the years I believe a few of them have been lost. It’s interesting that about two-thirds of the notebooks are dedicated to her research into the medieval period and the rest are Regency.

What was the most surprising thing you learned while doing your research? What was the hardest part of writing your fabulous biography? 

~ The most surprising thing was realising just how much of the Regency world Heyer had known firsthand. She grew up in a house that had a cook and two maids, she would have travelled by horse and carriage and been very class conscious. Think season one of Downton Abbey and that is a world Georgette would have known through her friend Dorothy Arbuthnot and her father’s connections in the theatre. I was also amazed at just how much of herself she wrote into her novels – especially the suppressed contemporary books.

~ The hardest, most difficult part was getting the balance right between the light and the dark sides of Heyer. She could be so difficult, self-deprecating and acerbic at times and yet she could also be so kind and generous, witty and affectionate. I found her an immensely complex person and I wanted to show all her facets so the reader could understand her. One of the challenges was having so many of her letters and wanting to let her speak for herself. I had to use the letters because they are the main primary source we have from her and her writing is compelling, but letters are a very private medium and I’m not sure she’s always her own best advocate in them. I’m so glad you enjoyed them though and Sir Richard did say she wrote her letters exactly as she spoke.

Ten years? You really did spend a decade on this research? Could anything have occurred to speed up this process? 

~ Looking back it seems amazing to me that it took that long. Mind you, I spend three of those years doing the doctorate, wrote Georgette Heyer’s Regency World and then began writing the biography. I originally thought the biography would take me about 18 months to write but I kept discovering more information and archives of letters that necessitated another trip to England. In the end the biography took me nearly five years to write but I don’t regret a moment. What I hadn’t realised when I began was how many new research lines would be opened up by her letters or that I would feel compelled to follow up every single one. So I guess there was no real way to shorten the process.

At what point in the writing process did you secure a publishing contract? Were you agented at the beginning? 

~ I had an Australian agent for my first book, Georgette Heyer’s Regency World, but my current US agent sold the biography to Sourcebooks in America. That was really exciting.

What pleases you most about your biography? 

~ One of the main reasons for writing the Heyer biography was to see her properly acknowledged. Although her fans understand the brilliance of her writing, there are far too many people who haven’t read her and don’t understand her achievement. I mean, Georgette Heyer created the Regency genre of historical fiction and is still one of the great bestsellers, as well as one of the few of her literary generation popular in the twenty-first century. I like to think that my biography reveals what a wonderful writer she was as well as a fascinating and very private person.

Do you see any more biographies of dead English women (my favorite genre!)  in your future? TCM-cover for media large

~ Well, I think a biography of Angela Thirkell would be interesting to write but for now I’m loving writing fiction. My first novel The Cinderella Moment came out last month and, even though it’s contemporary YA, it has definite Heyer influences!

Advertisements

23 thoughts on “Q & A with Heyer’s Biographer

  1. I’ve been looking forward to this interview. Julian Fellowes (Downton Abbey, Gosford Park) said in an interview that his country house settings and characters were inspired by his relatives and their houses from the Edwardian period. It will be interesting to read about Heyer’s youth and where she grew up–were there any relatives or places that inspired her marvelous characters and houses from her books?

    • I love Julian Fellowes’ work and I’ve often wondered if he was a Heyer reader so it’s fascinating to know that about his Edwardian influences. Heyer did have relatives who lived in Somerset in a house called Norton Manor which I believe was rather grand. Her paternal grandparents were also fairly well to do and had an impressive-looking house in Worthing (going by the photos). I suspect her friend Doreen Arbuthnot (great-niece of the Duchess of Atholl), to whom, Heyer dedicated the original US edition of Simon the Coldheart, may also have been an influence. She lived in a house with footmen and a full retinue of servants. As for characters, we know for certain that in her detective novels at least, Heyer would often use characteristics of people she’d met or even family members – herself included!

      • A little off the subject, but Julian Fellows just blows me away. I want to craft characters that people care about. No one does it better than Fellows. He’s just brilliant.

        You mentioned her detective novels in your reply to Anglyn. I was happy to see (in Jennifer’s book) that my favorite of Heyer’s detective fiction (Death in the Stocks) was one she wrote without hubby’s input. I liked it because the wit and humor were so Heyeresque.

  2. Jennifer, your biography of Georgette Heyer was brilliant. I felt like I knew her after reading it. What a lovely way to spend ten years. Regency authors and readers owe everything to Heyer. Without her we wouldn’t exist!

    • Thank you so much Diane. It is wonderful to know that you felt that way because I very much wanted her readers to know her better and, as you say, we owe her a great debt!

      • Thanks for visiting us, Jennifer. Ditto to what Diane said. Your Heyer biography humanized her. We did feel like we knew her. Not like you, of course. You got to see her handwriting and personal photo albums, and even those famed notebooks. Thanks so much for writing such a brilliant work.

    • Yes, her research books were fascinating and I spent many hours poring over them and learning all sorts of things about her sources, her interests and even her language. They are still held by the family but I imagine they will eventually end up in an archive somewhere and be accessible to the general public.

      • Now that Sir Richard’s gone, will the personal things, like the photo albums, go to Heyer’s only natural grandchild? Is he still alive? Did you meet him? I expect yhr Rougiers tried to make no distinction between Richard’s son and Suzie’s from her first marriage.

  3. Thank you so much for this interview. It adds a lot to reading the biography. I love your regency ramblings and am grateful that you care to share your wonderful information with all of us.

  4. Jennifer and Cheryl,
    Thanks so much for this fascinating insight into Heyer. Jennifer, love your Heyer book and loved being in some of your workshops. You knowledge is incredible and I’m so pleased you share it with other Heyer fans.

  5. Hi Cheryl Georgette had only one grandchild, Nicholas. He is 47 and lives in London after many years in the States. He inherited part of his gather’s estate but not the copyrights. These are held by Richard’s widow for her lifetime & then willed to Cambridge & Marlborough College equally.

  6. Pingback: Georgette Heyer: These Old Shades | T. L. Ryder

  7. I sorry to come back so late to the discussion but there’s a rumor that there was no such thing as a Little Season. That’s not been my understanding. Any comment?

  8. Greetings I am so grateful I found your web site, I really found you by accident,
    while I was looking on Askjeeve for something else,
    Anyhow I am here now and would just like to say many thanks for a remarkable post and a all round
    exciting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the minute
    but I have saved it and also included your RSS feeds, so when
    I have time I will be back to read more, Please do keep up the fantastic
    work.

  9. I’ve been a devoted Heyer fan since I was about 12 years old and they have been a constant in my life really. However, I reread ‘Infamous Army ‘ recently after many years and was disappointed to realise that the heavy Irish involvement in the Battle of Waterloo was not dealt with. I was wondering if this is because the Irish who fought for Wellington – dispossessed, disenfranchised and probably desperately poor – would not have suited the ‘one big happy family ‘ image she sought to present. Regards Anne

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s